Your question is one of the best when we speak about hard disk S.M.A.R.T.
As you see, the field "Data" contains a raw value (an error or just a counter or a raw value
measured by a sensor inside the hard disk) and the "Value" field is
*somehow* calculated from this "Data".
The problem is that this information is not released by hard disk manufacturers.
The amount of raw Data change required to modify the "Value" field is different
from model to model (or even different firmware on same model has different values).
Manufacturers may use "tricks" to show their drives better than they really are.
This is why it is not advisable to rely on the "Value" and "Threshold" pairs.
Years showed that this conception is wrong, the article at
http://www.hdsentinel.com/smart/ describes it why with more details.
This is why the original idea of Hard Disk Sentinel is to analyse the "Data" field
and evaluate the real number of errors. The result is that the real number of
problems are logged, displayed and the unknown variables are eliminated from
the monitoring and failure prevention system.
Ps. if you can use the Report menu Send test report to developer, it helps as I can examine
the complete S.M.A.R.T. information of the drive. Such reports help me to analyse
the relation between the attributes and improve the software.
balabi wrote:I am really thankful for your patient and excellent reply.But I still have some doubts.After 12 days
the raw value date has reached 119.On the other hand,it is true that the "value " is still 100 ,far above the threshold 30.I am curious about the the mathematical relation between "date" and "value" on this particular item"reallocated event count".That is to say,how long will I have to wait the "value" to become from 100 to 99 for example ?