WTY Replacement: HDS Vs MFR reality
Posted: 2012.06.22. 09:55
I've become very good at RMAing HDD to Western Digital (primarly WD20EARS)...well I've got three in waiting for assessment for a return!
I find that if the HDD Fails the quick or extended test then WD will RMA your drive. This is backed up not just by my personal experience but the following communications
- On their website "If you encounter the same error code more than once after re-testing, we recommend for you to create an RMA" (http://support.wdc.com/techinfo/general/errorcodes.asp)
- After e-mailing them either the details or a screen shot of the DataLife guard error / HDS Overview Info their response was "Based on the error codes you provided, the drives appear to be faulty and should be replaced. "
FYI - this is different to what HDS advises as each of these drives had not yet reached 0% health at that time hence was marked as "At this point, warranty replacement of the disk is not yet possible, only if the heath drops further". Given WDC's stance that anything that fails the quick or extended test more than once is eligible for WTY Replacement, it may be worth adding this criteria to the calculation of Heath and hence the RMA recommendation.
At present, HDS has a more stringent criteria for RMAing a drive the MFR!
I find that if the HDD Fails the quick or extended test then WD will RMA your drive. This is backed up not just by my personal experience but the following communications
- On their website "If you encounter the same error code more than once after re-testing, we recommend for you to create an RMA" (http://support.wdc.com/techinfo/general/errorcodes.asp)
- After e-mailing them either the details or a screen shot of the DataLife guard error / HDS Overview Info their response was "Based on the error codes you provided, the drives appear to be faulty and should be replaced. "
FYI - this is different to what HDS advises as each of these drives had not yet reached 0% health at that time hence was marked as "At this point, warranty replacement of the disk is not yet possible, only if the heath drops further". Given WDC's stance that anything that fails the quick or extended test more than once is eligible for WTY Replacement, it may be worth adding this criteria to the calculation of Heath and hence the RMA recommendation.
At present, HDS has a more stringent criteria for RMAing a drive the MFR!