Page 1 of 1
HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.30. 08:16
by Leole
Hello,
in the new hdsentinel version 0.20.10851 the paramater -solid does not show valid power on hours values.
It looks like
Code: Select all
./hdsentinel -solid
/dev/sda ? ? 4951452 QEMU____QEMU_HARDDISK ? 32767
/dev/sdb 33 100 4951452 ST18000NM000J-2TV103 ZR5BW2AG 17166336
/dev/sdc 25 100 4951452 Verbatim_Vi550_S3 493522354831136 488386
The previous version 0.19c.9986 works as expected
Code: Select all
./hdsentinel.19 -solid
/dev/sda ? ? 4924908 QEMU____QEMU_HARDDISK ? 32767
/dev/sdb 33 100 7471 ST18000NM000J-2TV103 ZR5BW2AG 17166336
/dev/sdc 25 100 7378 Verbatim_Vi550_S3 493522354831136 488386
Can you correct this ?
Thanks and regards
Leo
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.30. 15:11
by hdsentinel
Seems so interesting as generally the -solid parameter (or anything "near" the reporting the power on time) is not changed at all.
Can you please send complete reports (generated with -r switch) to info (at) hdsentinel (dot) com address by both the previous and the latest version?
Then I can compare the detected power on time values in general and check specifically as I suspect the issue is somehow related to your dev/sda drive (the value is weird for that by both versions).
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.31. 07:33
by Leole
Hello,
i have send you the requested reports by email.
Thanks and regards
Leo
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.31. 07:49
by Leole
Hello again,
if i compare the smart values in both reports i get the same in in both.
Code: Select all
S.M.A.R.T.
------------
No. Attribute Thre.. Value Worst Data
9 Power On Time Count 50 100 100 000000001CEA (7402 in decimal)
9 Power On Time Count 0 92 92 000000001D47 (7495 in decimal)
These values are correct in this case. But as mentined before only old hdsentinal -solid display correct values.
regards
Leo
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.31. 08:35
by Leole
hdsentinel wrote: ↑2023.08.30. 15:11
Seems so interesting as generally the -solid parameter (or anything "near" the reporting the power on time) is not changed at all.
Can you please send complete reports (generated with -r switch) to info (at) hdsentinel (dot) com address by both the previous and the latest version?
Then I can compare the detected power on time values in general and check specifically as I suspect the issue is somehow related to your dev/sda drive (the value is weird for that by both versions).
To clarify i only interested on /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.31. 11:18
by hdsentinel
Thanks for the files, I'll check what could be the issue. Thanks for your attention.
Maybe you can use -onlydevs option and specify the /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc devices to check and report details only for them (new option in the 0.20 version), this may give different results now.
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.08.31. 12:16
by Leole
hdsentinel wrote: ↑2023.08.31. 11:18
Thanks for the files, I'll check what could be the issue. Thanks for your attention.
Maybe you can use -onlydevs option and specify the /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc devices to check and report details only for them (new option in the 0.20 version), this may give different results now.
Hello,
i have tried /hdsentinel -solid with additional parameter
-dev /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc
-devs /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc
-onlydevs /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc
-nodevs /dev/sda
but allways the same incorrect power on hours values
Thanks and regards
Leo
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.12.05. 12:14
by hdsentinel
Can you please check:
https://www.hdsentinel.com/hdslin/hdsentinel-020b-x64.zip
(assuming you use the 64 bit Linux version).
It should correctly show the power on time with -solid option too.
Thanks for your attention and patience.
Re: HDsentinel 0.20.10851 with parameter -solid
Posted: 2023.12.18. 11:17
by Leole
Hello,
i have testet https://www.hdsentinel.com/hdslin/hdsentinel-020b-x64.zip
-solid option works now as expected.
Thanks and regards
Leo