Thanks for the disk report.
I examined the situation and it seems the disk really has some problems as reported in the text description:
"There are 62 bad sectors on the disk surface. The contents of these sectors were moved to the spare area."
It means that as the drive performed operations (for example the cloning you mentioned), it may find 62
sectors which need to be re-allocated: the drive marked the original sectors as bad (to prevent
use of them) and put the information to the spare area instead. All further reads/writes are redirected
to the spare area.
After this procedure and if the disk status is stable, the surface tests show only green blocks:
it means the drive is stable and there are no (further) problems, no further re-allocation required.
(for more information about "bad sectors", please click on the "?" next to the text description
or check
http://www.hdsentinel.com/faq.php#health )
In this case (as the surface test confirmed that the drive surface is now correct),
you can manually acknowledge the reported problems in Hard Disk Sentinel,
to clear the errors reported from the text description and restore the health to 100%.
That way the software will no longer display these problems, just reports any
possible new problems, errors (in the future).
To do this, please open the S.M.A.R.T. page of the hard disk in Hard Disk Sentinel.
Locate the attribute(s) marked with yellow exclamation mark (!) and check the
number reported the text description. Please enter the same value but with negative sign
to the "Offset" column in the appropriate column.
In this situation, please locate "5 Reallocated sectors count" and specify "-62" in the offset column.
Shortly the health will be restored to 100% and the reported errors will be cleared from
the text description.
Note that this is done only for this system. So if you put the hard disk to an other system,
the software will report the real (non-modified) status of the hard disk.
In general, these errors can't be cleared from the drive itself.
I wonder when you put it back to the other system (or used the USB-SATA converter)
how it could be reported as 100% (if there were no such "offset" used on that system but
I assume there was no such setting used).
If possible, please try to send a report when this same hard disk is connected by the
USB-SATA converter to the other computer, where you saw 100% status.
In some very rare situations, it is possible that the USB-SATA converter provides
incorrect/modified values. It would be nice to check and confirm if this is the case
or if there is anything which can cause the difference.
The best would be if we can examine the situation with the other drive also you mentioned
(by checking two different reports: when it is shown as 100 % and when it is showing problems).
Do you use the same USB-SATA converter for this hard disk also?
This is why I suspect that there may be an issue related to that.
Ps. I sent e-mail also with this answer.