Search found 16 matches
- 2022.07.22. 15:16
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Data transfer rate
- Replies: 0
- Views: 13927
Data transfer rate
Copying a disk partition, HDS reported a maximum data transfer rate of 3792kB/s (3.7MB/s) throughout the copy operation. Windows Resource Monitor by contrast reported 44MB/s!! If the HDS figure were correct the partition copy would still be running 10 hours from now, but it just finished after about...
- 2022.07.18. 17:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Surface test Re-Initialise
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5219
Re: Surface test Re-Initialise
Thank you
It's good to get confirmation that my interpretation of the results was correct - Use only as a "scratch" disk.
It won't go near the RAID array again!
Thanks
David
It's good to get confirmation that my interpretation of the results was correct - Use only as a "scratch" disk.
It won't go near the RAID array again!
Thanks
David
- 2022.07.17. 19:01
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Surface test Re-Initialise
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5219
Surface test Re-Initialise
I'm running a Surface Test reinitialise against a SAS drive from a RAID 5 array that went inconsistent. When I took the dirve out and introduced it to HDS, it reported 4 uncorrected read errors and 3 uncorrected write errors. Not long into the process it hit a sticky spot on the drive which it event...
- 2020.07.30. 22:34
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6173
Re: Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
How are you getting on with a build to handle this? Do you need more data
Cheers
David
Cheers
David
- 2020.07.25. 12:23
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6173
Re: Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
It's beginning to look like the second one might be ms since most recent power on. No that was wrong the first PoT timer has a value of 742 and the second one has a value of 48,627,714 right now If the second one is ms that translates to 13 hours 30 minutes and change. But the first one (if minutes)...
- 2020.07.25. 04:23
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6173
Further to Power on TIme for Lenovo drive
I posted yesterday about a Lenovo drive (IBM-ESXS WD4001FYYG-23S) showing an Estimated PoT of 136 days. That post hasn't appeared on the list yet. This post is a follow up to that. I ran a Short Self Test, followed by a Long Self Test. Interestingly the Self Test results show power on time of 0 hour...
- 2020.07.24. 18:32
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Power on hours
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2576
Power on hours
I just bought a couple of Lenovo branded WD4001FYYG 4TB SAS drives which were advertised as brand new (old stock I assume). The model ID reported is IBM-ESXS WD4001FYYG-23S. They were supplied in sealed anti-static bags with Silica Desiccant pouches inside. I just let HDSentinel loose on the first o...
- 2019.12.19. 11:53
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Surface Test Re-Initialize
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7105
Surface Test Re-Initialize
I just had to pull a disk from a RAID and ran the Surface Test re-initialize function on it. After 33hrs the test completed with one block marked orange and a message saying that there was a CRC check on sector number 7210516032. Has HDS already re-allocated the sector in this case or are there furt...
- 2018.10.23. 13:21
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7129
Re: Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
If you need access to an Ubuntu system with an Adaptec Raid (ASR-51245) installed, I can try to drill a hole in my firewall to get you in.
Dave
Dave
- 2018.10.21. 19:15
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7129
Re: Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
That's a shame - do I understand this is quite tricky to achieve on Linux?
Dave
Dave
- 2018.10.18. 03:33
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7129
Disks behind Adaptec Raid Controller
I can't speak for the non-Linux version, but the Linux version doesn't seem to report on the state of individual drives attached to an Adaptec Raid controller. I have configured smartd.conf to monitor them: /dev/sdb -d aacraid,0,0,0 -n standby -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner /...
- 2017.12.15. 12:45
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Offset for SAS and SCSI devices
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13403
Re: Offset for SAS and SCSI devices
Any progress on allowing offset values for SAS / SCSI drives?
Thanks
Dave
Thanks
Dave
- 2016.11.26. 13:26
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Offset for SAS and SCSI devices
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13403
Offset for SAS and SCSI devices
For SATA disks that support S.M.A.R.T. you allow the user to "offset" values to reset the "drive health" calculation to defaults. I have a SAS drive that has a few thousand Uncorrected Read Errors and Uncorrected Verify Errors in the S.M.A.R.T. log and as a result reports a low H...
- 2016.11.25. 20:29
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Surface test reinitialise surface
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3801
Re: Surface test reinitialise surface
Thank you
Dave
Dave
- 2016.11.25. 18:41
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Surface test reinitialise surface
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3801
Surface test reinitialise surface
I'm looking at a partially complete disk re-initialise. Most blocks in the chart are a pale green indicating "Good". There are no yellow or red blocks. One block is a darker green/turquoise, and a few other blocks are slightly darker than the rest. What does this indicate please? Thanks Dave
- 2015.10.25. 15:16
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: 4.60.10b Content?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3660
4.60.10b Content?
I can't post to the General Discussion area for some reason, so am posting here.
I just noticed you'd posted a new release on 2nd October. What features are in 4.60.10b beyond the standard 4.60.10?
Thanks
Dave
I just noticed you'd posted a new release on 2nd October. What features are in 4.60.10b beyond the standard 4.60.10?
Thanks
Dave